Between this, Sicario, and his work on the show Sons of Anarchy, Taylor Sheridan has a real interest and knack for writing modern-day crime. His greatest talent as well as his flaw as a screenwriter is that he is a pitch perfect scribe when it comes to observing and relaying said observations about modern America, but not so much at brilliantly expanding on them or offering any groundbreaking wisdom on them thematically. This film was described to me as a "dumbed down No Country for Old Men", which is fairly apt, if a little harsh. The movie isn't quite "dumb", just straightforward. Sheridan's presentations of post-financial crisis middle America, the casual racism of the South, and the general attitude of distrust and violence borne out of the country's most cinematically ignored regions is spot-on in terms of dialogue and performance, but the viewer is left with simple musings and exhibitions rather than meditations. It's a minor complaint - Sheridan is great, but has room to be brilliant.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/544c9/544c9dc88e4e77bba8bb45943cf0cc93e06625ab" alt=""
That is really this film's high point - the characters and performances. Ben Foster aims to steal the show as a belligerent, borderline psychopathic man of action, and he is a great deal of fun to watch, but Chris Pine upstages him particularly in the second half. Pine's performance is one of surprising reservation and subtlety, and by the end he is one of the most gripping actors to watch onscreen. Jeff Bridges gives his best performance in several years, as well as delivering the vast majority of the comic relief. His relationship with his accomplice, played wonderfully by Gil Birmingham, was my favorite character dynamic in the film. It feels like a real friendship, albeit a troubled one that makes for some great drama in the last third of the film.
Ultimately, the dynamics between the two criminals, specifically Pine, and Bridges's sheriff character is what drives the thematic crux of the movie. Two men acting against a system they believe - with some good reason - has wronged them, and a sheriff who tells us before we justify too many of their actions, to remember that they're not saints or above the law. Both characters' worldviews are simplistic and biased, and it's what makes their characters interesting. And the characters' interactions with the various townsfolk who agree with our protagonists' lawlessness to varying degrees is, as I said before, while maybe lacking in significant subtext, note-perfect in execution. And when I think about it, though this is a rather timeless story structured like any good crime thriller, this movie is very much written for the now. In the political climate it was made for, those simple musings and on-their-face presentations of middle America may be all there needs to be to strike up conversation.
Overall, Hell or High Water is a smart, incredibly well-acted, and very entertaining crime thriller that, like Sicario, was just short of being really great. If you enjoy your violent crime dramas with some slow-burning tension and lots of character development as well as ample gunfights and manly talk, then it's a good time at the movies. And Jeff Bridges makes the second half very memorable - the climax alone is worth the price of admission.
Grade: A-
Caesars Rewards Casino Review - JTM Hub
ReplyDeleteWhat games can you 삼척 출장샵 play at Caesars Rewards Casino? You can 광명 출장마사지 play for real money 용인 출장샵 at 정읍 출장안마 Caesars Casino with free 계룡 출장마사지 spins and welcome bonuses.